Protected Conversations vs Without Prejudice Conversations

When employment issues arise, employers may want to discuss a potential exit with an employee in a way that reduces legal risk. Two common approaches are a protected conversation and a without prejudice conversation.

Ian King, Company Director Published · 2 min read

Need HR advice?

Talk it through with one of our HR consultants.

Free HR advice
Colleagues sitting at laptops.

Introduction

When employment issues arise, employers may want to discuss a potential exit with an employee in a way that reduces legal risk. Two common approaches are a protected conversation and a without prejudice conversation. Although both provide a degree of confidentiality, they work in different ways under UK employment law.

What is a Protected Conversation?

A protected conversation is a statutory tool under Section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It allows an employer and employee to have an “off the record” discussion about ending employment, usually linked to a settlement agreement.

  • No dispute needs to exist before the conversation takes place.
  • The conversation cannot usually be referred to in ordinary unfair dismissal claims.
  • However, it does not apply to claims involving discrimination, whistleblowing or automatic unfair dismissal.

What is a Without Prejudice Conversation?

A Without Prejudice conversation is based on common law. It protects genuine settlement discussions when a dispute is already underway between the employer and employee.

  • There must be a genuine dispute for the protection to apply.
  • Conversations are generally inadmissible in tribunal proceedings if they form part of settlement negotiations.
  • Protection can extend to a wider range of claims, including discrimination, as long as settlement is being genuinely attempted.

Key Differences Between Protected and Without Prejudice Conversations

  1. Protected conversation – No existing dispute required, but protection is limited to ordinary unfair dismissal claims.
  2. Without prejudice conversation – Requires a dispute, but can cover a broader scope of claims.

Why Employers Need to Know the Difference

Misunderstanding the distinction between a protected conversation and a without prejudice conversation can expose employers to legal risk. If you rely on the wrong type, there is a chance the discussion could be used as evidence in tribunal proceedings. Employers should always seek professional advice before starting these conversations to ensure they are legally protected.

We have outsourced our HR and payroll to Bespoke HR for the past few years. For us, the two work together in tandem which means we have all our staff needs covered.

Pankti Deshpande Financial Controller, Minna Technologies
Ian King

Written by

Ian King

Company Director, Bespoke HR

Since 2005, Ian has co-owned Bespoke HR with Alison, the company’s founder. In 2012, he became Company Director and gradually focused more of his time on the business, and has now transitioned fully to Bespoke HR. He applies his technical and business experience to help manage and grow the company, focusing on finance, marketing, commercial strategy, IT, and process improvement and automation.

Meet the team LinkedIn

More on employment law

All employment law articles